Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project
13 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010051001
Lead Agency
San Diego Association of Governments
Document Title
Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/3/2015
Present Land Use
Generally the project would be located within or adjacent to transportation rights-of-way (i.e., railroad, I-5, and street)
Document Description
The University of California design approval is for the segment of the project that crosses the SD campus on an elevated structure with two stations located on University property. The larger Mid-Coast Corridor Transit project will extend the existing SD Trolley system from the US-Mexico border north, through Downtown SD, to a northern terminus in University City. The total project is approximately 11-miles in length and includes 9 total stations.
Contact Information
Name
Leslie Blanda
Agency Name
San Diego Association of Governments
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Generally along I-5 corridor between Downtown San Diego and University City
Zip
Various
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR 52; I-5, I-8, I-805
Railways
BNSF
Airports
San Diego
Schools
UCSD
Waterways
Pacific Ocean, San Diego River, Rose Creeks & Tecolote Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.