Fairfield Train Station Specific Plan
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010042093
Lead Agency
City of Fairfield
Document Title
Fairfield Train Station Specific Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/27/2011
Present Land Use
agriculture, parks and recreation, open space, public/quasi-public, industrial, office, community commercial, residential, etc.
Document Description
The focal point of the Specific Plan is the train station, located at the intersection of Peabody and Vanden Road. The train station has already been approved. Permitting and construction planning have commenced. The station is part of the Capitol Corridor system and is scheduled for operation in 2014. A minimum of 3,000 dwelling units would be located within a one-half mile radius of the station. The Specific Plan could accommodate up to an additional 6,800 dwelling units, an added population of ~ 19,277, roughly 5 million sq ft of commercial and industrial development, and a range of public and open space uses on ~ 2,972 acres of land.
Contact Information
Name
David Feinstein
Agency Name
City of Fairfield, community Development Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fairfield
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
Intersection of Peabody and Vanden Road
Zip
94533
Total Acres
2,972
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
Hwy 12
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Travis AFB
Schools
Vanden HS, Center ES
Waterways
Union Creek, McCoy Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Fairfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.