Palmer House Renovation Project; Design Review (DR 2010-01)

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010032077
Lead Agency
Calistoga, City of (City of Calistoga)
Document Title
Palmer House Renovation Project; Design Review (DR 2010-01)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Mr. Fiddaman and Ms. Hoffman purchased the Palmer house in mid-2009 with the idea of preserving this important building for future generations to enjoy, They consider themselves caretakers of an important piece of Calistoga history. As such, it is their intent to restore/renovate the Palmer house to its former status as a high quality residence. Although the house is in relatively good condition for its age, it has been neglected for the past several years and need extensive repairs and maintenance. Preservation efforts will be guided by the Secretary of interior's standards for historical buildings. While some nominal changes (almost all of the interior) will be made to the house to accomplish usability in today's living context, these changes will only be to the rear part of the exterior of the building and affect only previous updates that have occurred in the last 15 years. It is the overall intent to preserve the house (and its earliest "turn of the century" additions) in its original form to the greatest extent possible.

Contact Information
Erik V. Lundquist
City of Calistoga
1232 Washington Street
Calistoga City, CA 94515

707-942-2827

Location

Cities
Calistoga
Counties
Napa
Cross Streets
1300 Cedar St
Zip
94515
Total Acres
19,000
Parcel #
011-223-002
Airports
defunct Gilderport
Schools
Calistoga ES, MS, & HS
Waterways
Napa River
Township
8N
Range
7W

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Calistoga
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
City of Calistoga Planning & Building Department 1232 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 95415

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search