Powerhouse Science Center (P10-014)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010032067
Lead Agency
City of Sacramento
Document Title
Powerhouse Science Center (P10-014)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/2/2010
Document Description
The Powerhouse Science Center project proposes to develop the northern half of the R.T. Matsui Waterfront Park, which is approximately 6.35 of undeveloped land; rehabilitate the former PG&E Power Station; and , construct new facilities at the to accommodate the Sacramento Museum of History, Science and Technology (SMHT). The Project includes the following: Amendment of the Master Plan for the Robert T. Matsui Waterfront Park to reflect the uses proposed for the Project Site and redesignation as a community park. Improvements to the Park, including additional surface parking, rebuilding the promenade and main lawn, and installation of play and art structures, and sound and shade structures; Rehabilitation of the former PG&E Power Station B building to serve as the Powerhouse Science Center; A Planetarium and Challenger Center would be constructed; Education Center and Restaurant; On-site parking with a two story parking structure and surface level parking lots; and, Development of two "Living Machine" waste-water reuse systems.
Contact Information
Name
Dana Allen
Agency Name
City of Sacramento
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Jibboom St
Total Acres
6.35
Parcel #
various
State Highways
I-5
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
Sacramento and American Rivers
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Sacramento
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.