Plan Amendment No. 2012-002

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010031106
Lead Agency
Reedley, City of (City of Reedley)
Document Title
Plan Amendment No. 2012-002
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The City of Reedley proposes to adopt Plan Amendment Application No. 2012-002, which proposes to amend the Reedley General Plan 2012 to be retitled the Reedley General Plan 2030 Update (GPU). The GPU has been prepared pursuant to California Government Code Section 65300, and shall serve as the principal policy document for guiding development of the City through the year 2030. The Reedley General Plan 2030 Update focused on updates to the Land Use, Circulation, Conservation and Ocean Space, Noise, and Safety Elements of the General Pan 2012. The GPU provides an overall direction for decision-making on development proposals and day-to-day actions of the City's elected officials and staff. The GPU is also designed to incorporate the goals and policies of the various adopted specific plans including the Reedley Specific Plan, Rail Corridor Master Plan and the Southeast Reedley Industrial Area Specific Plan. The GPU also proposes to expand the City's sphere of influence by 2,157 acres in the locations identified in Attachment "A".

Contact Information
Kevin Fabino
City of Reedley
1733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654

559-637-4200 ext 286

Location

Cities
Reedley
Zip
93654
Total Acres
7,913
Railways
San Joaquin Valley RR
Airports
Reedley Municipal Airport
Schools
Numerous public/private
Waterways
Kings River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Reedley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
City of Reedley Community Development Department 1733 Ninth Street, Reedley CA 93654

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search