Cameron Ridge Wind Energy Project (CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit (ITP) No. 2081-2011-031-04, Minor Amendment 5

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010031096
Lead Agency
Kern County
Document Title
Cameron Ridge Wind Energy Project (CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit (ITP) No. 2081-2011-031-04, Minor Amendment 5
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/23/2016
Present Land Use
A-1 (Limited Agriculture)/Vacant Land adjacent to wind turbine farm

Document Description
The Project involves the construction and operation of 26 wind turbines and associated infrastructure on approx. 1,350 acres. This proposed project involves a minor amendment to the ITP referenced above to extend the expiration date of the ITP and the deadline to permanently protect the Habitat Management (HM) Lands for 12 months, from Jan. 1, 2016 to Jan. 1, 2017. The ITP as amended authorizes take of Bakersfield cactus (Opuntia basilarus var. treleasei), a species designated as endangered under CESA. The ITP and Minor Amendments No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (ITP, as amended) as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation. CDFW issued the ITP, as amended, as a responsible agency under the CEQA, relying on mitigated negative declarations prepared for the Project as approved by the lead agency, Kern County.

Contact Information
Lisa Gymer
California Department of Fish and Game, Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : 559-243-4014 x238

Location

Cities
Mojave
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Cameron Canyon Rd/Oak Creek Rd
Total Acres
60.61
Parcel #
237-450-01, 10, 11, 12, 13
Township
11N
Range
13W
Section
7
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
1234 East Shaw Ave., Fresno, CA 93710

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search