Henry Blohm MUP 09-07, IS 09-05

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010022045
Lead Agency
Lake County
Document Title
Henry Blohm MUP 09-07, IS 09-05
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2008-0194-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Henry Blohm. This project will install a bridge across Big Canyon Creek in order to connect portions of the Permittee's property separated by the creek. The proposed bridge is 50 feet long and 12 feet wide. Each end of the bridge will be supported by concrete footings. The bridge will be constructed above the high water level (1540'). Approximately 170 cubic yards of rock deposited in the streambed during winter storms will be removed or placed on the bank to reduce flooding and further depositions. Rip rap will be placed on each bank of the stream for stabilization at each end of the bridge. Two 12" culverts will also be installed at an existing low water crossing on an unnamed drainage tributary to Big Canyon Creek.

Contact Information
Kelley Barker
Department of Fish and Game
North Central Region 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

916-358-4353

Location

Coordinates
38°50'46.8"N 122°39'54.5"W
Counties
Lake
Cross Streets
Perini and Harbin Springs Rd
Zip
95461
Total Acres
225
Parcel #
012-006-24
Waterways
Big Canyon Creek
Township
12N
Range
7W
Section
32
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Middletown

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Community Development Department/ Planning Division 255 N. Forbes St. Lakeport, CA

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search