Brewer Road Bridge at King Slough Bridge Replacement

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010022008
Lead Agency
Placer County
Document Title
Brewer Road Bridge at King Slough Bridge Replacement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2011-0043-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Placer County Department of Public Works. The project is limited to removal of the existing Brewer Road Bridge where it crosses Markham Ravine and construction of a new concrete bridge in its place at the same site. Current bridge abutments will be removed and new abutments will be constructed further back. The outfalls from roadside drainage ditches into Markham Ravine will be rocked to minimize continuing bank cutting from storm runoff. While work is ongoing within the stream channel water will be diverted around the project area.

Contact Information
Robert C. Hosea
Department of Fish and Game
Sacramento Valley and Sierra Region 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

916 704 9156

Location

Coordinates
38°50'18"N 121°27'5"W
Cities
Lincoln
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Brewer Rd & East Catlett Rd
Zip
95668
Total Acres
1.95
Parcel #
017-010-002, 042; 021-110-009, 042
State Highways
No
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
King Slough, Auburn Ravine, Pleasant Grove Creek
Township
11,12N
Range
5E
Section
5,6
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Pleasant Grove
Other Information
Section: 31, 32

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search