South Feather Power Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission No. P-2088
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010022007
Lead Agency
South Feather Water and Power Agency
Document Title
South Feather Power Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission No. P-2088
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/30/2018
Present Land Use
Butte: Timber Mountain/Timber Preserve Zone (TPZ)
Yuba: Rural Residential/TPZ
Plumas: Rural Residential (RR)/TPZ/RR/TPZ
Document Description
The SFWPA proposes to continue to operate its existing 117.3 megawatt Project located on the South Fork Feather River (SFFR), Lost Creek, and Slate Creek, in Butte, Yuba, and Plumas counties, CA. The project is a water supply//power project composed of 4 hydroelectric developments: Sly Creek, Woodleaf, Forbestown, and Kelly Ridge. The SFWPA proposes no capacity or operating changes, but has includes environmental measure that would help protect water quality, provide additional habitat for aquatic species, and provide whitewater boating opportunities for the public.
Contact Information
Name
Savannah Downey
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Oroville
Counties
Butte, Plumas, Yuba
Cross Streets
Various
State Highways
70
Waterways
South Fork Feather River
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: La Porte
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.