Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Box Springs Feeder Repair Phase 3

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010011051
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Box Springs Feeder Repair Phase 3
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Box Springs Feeder Repair Phase 3 Project is limited to the repair of damaged sections of the Box Spring Feeder, a pipeline which conveys raw water produced by the California State Water Project from the California Department of Water Resource's Santa Ana Valley Pipeline to the Applicant's Henry J. Mills Water Treatment Plant in Riverside. The Box Springs Feeder was constructed in 1975 and is 96 inches in diameter and ~2.26 miles in length. The project includes the repair of 12 pipe sections using 5 excavation sites; 3 of the excavation sites (Site Nos. 2, 3, and 4) are located within the Permittee's right-of-way within Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park in Riverside.

Contact Information
Ms. Anna Milloy
California Department of Fish and Game
Inland Deserts Region 6 4665 Lampson Avenue, Suite J
Los Alamitos, CA 90720

909-987-8176
562-799-8427

Location

Coordinates
33°55'28"N 117°18'33"W
Cities
Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
north of Alessandro Blvd, west of I-215, and south of Central Ave
Zip
92507
Total Acres
11.75
Parcel #
263-050-007, 12; 263-1609-1-1 & 1-5
State Highways
I-215, SR 60
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Taft, Edgemont, Kennedy
Waterways
Sycamore Canyon Creek
Township
3S
Range
4W
Section
9
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
DFG 4665 Lampson Ave, Suite J Los Alamitos, CA 90720

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search