Shiloh III Wind Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take permit No. 2081-2010-020-03); Minor Amendment No. 1

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009122009
Lead Agency
Solano County
Document Title
Shiloh III Wind Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take permit No. 2081-2010-020-03); Minor Amendment No. 1
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The proposed project involves the installation of 59 wind turbine generators (WTG) and foundations, access roads, control cables, power collection cables, and an electrical substation. The project will result in impacts to 80 acres of CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) habitat including temporary impacts to 65 acres; the project will permanently remove 15 acres of CA tiger salamander habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of CA tiger salamander, which is designated as a threatened species under the CA Endangered Species Act. DFG issued an incidental take permit for the project as a responsible agency under the CEQA relying on the environmental impact report prepared for the project and certified by the lead agency, County of Solano. The ITP authorizes incidental take of CA tiger salamander that may occur as a result of project implementation.

Contact Information
Carl Wilcox
DFG - Bay Delta Region
7329 Silverado Trail
Napa, CA 94558

707 944 5517

Location

Coordinates
38°10'"N 121°46'"W
Cities
Rio Vista
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
State Route 12 and Birds Landing Road
Zip
94571
Total Acres
4,500
Parcel #
Several
State Highways
SR-12
Airports
Rio Vista Municipal
Schools
Rio Vista HS
Waterways
Sacramento River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Solano County 375 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search