Smith Family Trust Pump Relocation Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009092084
Lead Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Document Title
Smith Family Trust Pump Relocation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/30/2009
Document Description
Petition to Change License 2805 proposes to relocate an existing point of diversion (POD) ~600 ft eastward from Department of Water Resources-owned land to land owned by the Smith Family Trust. The POD is located in the northwestern corner of the project site on the Reclamation District by 1002 Drainage Canal, which is tributary to Dredger Cut, also referred to as Lost Slough, which is a tributary to Snodgrass Slough. Relocation of the POD would involve removal of an existing pump and placement of the same or similar type of new pump. A power line with a transformer exists at the existing pump location. Sacramento Municipal Utilityi District intends to extend power from existing power lines by adding three poles along the northern bank of the Reclamation District 1002 Drainage Canal and extending aerial lines over the ditch channel to transfer power to the new pump. A new pipeline would be extended from the proposed pump ~500 ft southeast across an existing agricultural field and connected to an existing pipeline. The relocation of the POD would not change the amount of water diverted under the license or authorized place of use.
Contact Information
Name
Norm Ponferrada
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Twin Cities Rd and i-5
Zip
95757
Total Acres
58.1
Parcel #
146-0120-050-0000
State Highways
No
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
Dredger Cut (aka Last Slough), Snodgrass Slough
Township
5N
Range
5E
Section
16,17
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
SWRCB
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.