California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 5 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04
122 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009091126
Lead Agency
California High Speed Rail Authority
Document Title
California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 5 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/29/2018
Present Land Use
Various (urban[industrial, commercial and residential], rural residential, agricultural, and undeveloped)
Document Description
The project approved by CDFW consists of the ITP , Major Amendment No. 1 , Major Amendment No. 2, Major Amendment No. 3, and this Minor Amendment No. 4, and this Major Amendment 5 as referenced above and as issued by CDFW, which addresses construction and operation of the Fresno to Bakersfield segment of the HST, as approved by the lead agency, affecting or generally relates to fish and wildlife resources subject to the regulatory authority of CDFW, including the natural resources subject to the California Endangered Species Act. The ITP authorizes incidental take of the threatened California tiger salamander, San Joaquin antelope squirrel, Swainwon's hawk, and San Joaquin kit fox and the endangered Tipton kangaroo rat, species designated as threatened and endangered under CESA.
Contact Information
Name
Krista Tomlinson
Agency Name
CDFW, Central Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield, Fresno, Shafter
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
G Street and San Benito Street; 7th Standard Rd and Santa Fe Way
Zip
various
Total Acres
~114
Parcel #
various
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Multiple
Township
variou
Range
variou
Section
variou
Base
various
Other Information
Fresno to Bakersfield HST
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.