California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 2 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04

45 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009091126
Lead Agency
High Speed Rail Authority, California (California High Speed Rail Authority)
Document Title
California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 2 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project approved by CDFW consists of the ITP, Major Amendment No. 1, and this major amendment No. 2 as referenced above and reissued by CDFW, which addresses construction and operation of the Fresno to Bakersfield segment of HST, as approved by the lead agency, affecting or generally related to fish and wildlife resources subject to the regulatory authority of CDFW, including natural resources subject to the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The ITP authorizes incidential take of the threatened California tiger salamander, San Joaquin antelope squirrel, Swainson's hawk, and San Joaquin kit fox, and the endangered Tipton kangaroo rat, species designated as threatened and endangered under CESA.

Contact Information
Krista Tomlinson
CDFW
1234 East Shaw Ave
Fresno, CA 93710

559-243-4014

Location

Cities
Wasco Hanford Fresno Bakersfield
Counties
Kings
Cross Streets
G Street and San Benito Street, 7th Standard Rd and Santa Fe Way
Zip
various
Total Acres
~114
Parcel #
various
State Highways
Hwy 41
Railways
UPRR, BNSF, SJVRR
Airports
Several Local Airports
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Kings, Tule, & Kern Rivers; Cross & Poso Creeks
Township
variou
Range
variou
Section
variou
Base
various

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search