California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Permitting Phase 1 (Amendment No. 31 to Master Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0033-R4).
122 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009091126
Lead Agency
California High Speed Rail Authority
Document Title
California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Permitting Phase 1 (Amendment No. 31 to Master Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0033-R4).
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/15/2024
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has amended Master Streambed Alteration Agreement 1600-2015-0033-R4, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602, to the Permittee, California High Speed Rail Authority.
Amendment No. 31 involves revisions to Avoidance and Minimization Measure 2.15 to allow for concrete pours with the implementation of construction best management practices.
Contact Information
Name
Javier Mendez
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Job Title
Sr. Environmental Scientist (Specialist)
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Tulare
Regions
Southern California
Other Location Info
The Construction Footprint spans approximately 95 miles, from approximately 1,000 feet south of American Avenue south of the city of Fresno (Fresno County, Latitude 36°38.29"N, Longitude -119°45'32.3"W) to 7th Standard Road near the unincorporated community of Crome (Kern County; Latitude 35°26'29.07"N, Longitude -119°11'56.70"W) and generally parallels the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway or State Route 43. The Master Streambed Alteration Agreement also involves activities that will occur within offsite restoration sites.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Attachments
Notice of Determination
Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.