California High-Speed train Project: Merced to Frenso Major Amendment No. 7 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-025-04 (ITP)

134 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009091125
Lead Agency
California High Speed Rail Authority
Document Title
California High-Speed train Project: Merced to Frenso Major Amendment No. 7 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-025-04 (ITP)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/28/2019
Present Land Use
Various (urban[industrial, commercial, and residential, rural residential, agricultiral, and undeveloped)
Document Description
The project approved by CDFW consists of the ITP, Minor Amendment No. 1,No. 4, No. Major Amendment No. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as reference above and as issued by CDFW, which addresses construction and operation of the Merced to Fresno segment of the HST, as approved by the lead agency, affected or generally related to fish and wildlife resources subject to the regulatory authority of CDFW, including natural resources subject to the CESA. CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense, CTS) Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni, SWHA), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, SJKF), and hairy Orcutt grass (Ocuttia pilosa) (collectively, the Covered Species). CTS, SWHA, and SJKF are species designated as threatened and hairy Orcutt grass is designated as endangered under CESA *SEE NOD FOR FULL DETAILS.

Contact Information

Name
Krista Tomlinson
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Fresno, Madera
Zip
various
State Highways
Hwy 59,140,99,152,145,180,41
Railways
Union Pacific, BNSF
Airports
Castle, Merced, Madera
Schools
Various
Waterways
San Joaquin River, various smaller waterways
Township
var
Range
var
Section
var

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print