California High-Speed train Project: Merced to Frenso Major Amendment No. 7 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-025-04 (ITP)

49 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009091125
Lead Agency
High Speed Rail Authority, California (California High Speed Rail Authority)
Document Title
California High-Speed train Project: Merced to Frenso Major Amendment No. 7 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-025-04 (ITP)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project approved by CDFW consists of the ITP, Minor Amendment No. 1,No. 4, No. Major Amendment No. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as reference above and as issued by CDFW, which addresses construction and operation of the Merced to Fresno segment of the HST, as approved by the lead agency, affected or generally related to fish and wildlife resources subject to the regulatory authority of CDFW, including natural resources subject to the CESA. CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense, CTS) Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni, SWHA), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, SJKF), and hairy Orcutt grass (Ocuttia pilosa) (collectively, the Covered Species). CTS, SWHA, and SJKF are species designated as threatened and hairy Orcutt grass is designated as endangered under CESA *SEE NOD FOR FULL DETAILS.

Contact Information
Krista Tomlinson
CDFW
1234 E. Shaw Ave.
Fresno, CA 93710

559-243-4014

Location

Counties
Madera Fresno
Zip
various
State Highways
Hwy 59,140,99,152,145,180,41
Railways
Union Pacific, BNSF
Airports
Castle, Merced, Madera
Schools
Various
Waterways
San Joaquin River, various smaller waterways
Township
var
Range
var
Section
var

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search