Tree Removal along SR-137 - HSR Underpass over SR-137
52 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2009091125
- Lead Agency
- High Speed Rail Authority, California (California High Speed Rail Authority)
- Document Title
- Tree Removal along SR-137 - HSR Underpass over SR-137
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 2/25/2019
- Present Land Use
- Various (urban[industrial, commercial, and residential, rural residential, agricultiral, and undeveloped)
- Document Description
- Removal of the existing Eucalyptus trees long SR-137 on the South shoulder to ground level. Stumps to be removed at a later date, in tandem with future roadway excavation. Daytime closure of SR-137, to facilitate branch trimming and removal. Traffic handling to be conducting during the work.
- Contact Information
-
Trais Norris
Caltrans
855 M Street, Suite 200
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone : (559) 445-6447
Location
- Counties
- Kings
- Zip
- various
- State Highways
- Hwy 59,140,99,152,145,180,41
- Railways
- Union Pacific, BNSF
- Airports
- Castle, Merced, Madera
- Schools
- Various
- Waterways
- San Joaquin River, various smaller waterways
- Township
- var
- Range
- var
- Section
- var
- Other Location Info
- Whitley Ave (SR 137)
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Caltrans
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes