San Joaquin River Viaduct at SR99 Northbound Onramp - Foundation Only - HSRA Merced to Fresno
51 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2009091125
- Lead Agency
- High Speed Rail Authority, California (California High Speed Rail Authority)
- Document Title
- San Joaquin River Viaduct at SR99 Northbound Onramp - Foundation Only - HSRA Merced to Fresno
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/1/2016
- Present Land Use
- Various (urban[industrial, commercial, and residential, rural residential, agricultiral, and undeveloped)
- Document Description
- To the east of SR 99, the proposed San Joaquin River Viaduct beings north of the San Joaquin River and ends north of Herndon Ave. Near the existing SR 99 NB on-ramp, the viaduct spans over the existing UPRR tracks. The foundations for a total of eleven columns of the San Joaquin River Viaduct that are within the Caltrans Right of Way will be constructed as part of the San Joaquin River Viaduct - ESOC submittal (Foundations only).
- Contact Information
-
Trais Norris
Caltrans
855 M Street, Suite 200
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone : (559) 445-6447
Location
- Cities
- Fresno Madera
- Counties
- Fresno Madera
- Zip
- various
- State Highways
- Hwy 59,140,99,152,145,180,41
- Railways
- Union Pacific, BNSF
- Airports
- Castle, Merced, Madera
- Schools
- Various
- Waterways
- San Joaquin River, various smaller waterways
- Township
- var
- Range
- var
- Section
- var
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Caltrans
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes