Lower Calaveras River Anadromous Fish Barrier Removal Project - Central California Traction Railroad Crossing (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2

SCH Number: 2009082001
Lead Agency: Stockton East Water District
Document Title: Lower Calaveras River Anadromous Fish Barrier Removal Project - Central California Traction Railroad Crossing (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 7/9/2019

Document Description: Cont. Project Title: 013-0091-R2) The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2013-0091-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Stockton East Water District. The project consists of the construction of a roughened channel with six boulder weir drop structures immediately downstream of the existing Central California Traction Railroad Bridge crossing the Stockton Diverting Channel in Stockton, CA for the purpose of providing proper fish passage through the existing crossing, as described in detail in Streambed Alteration Agreement Notification Number 1600-2013-0091-R2. The existing crossing currently acts as an impediment to fish passage.

Contact Information: Kyle Stoner
Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 767-8178

Cities: Stockton
Counties: San Joaquin
Other Location Info: The project is located along the Central California Traction Railroad Crossing near Wilson Way on the Stockton Diverting Canal (river mile 6.5), in the City of Stockton, in the County of San Joaquin, State of California; Assessor's Parcel Numbers 132-010-03, 132-070-15, 132-070-14, 119-020-10; Latitude 37 degrees 59 minutes 16.63 seconds N, Longitude 121 degrees 15 minutes 51.85 seconds W.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No