SR-57/SR-60 Confluence at Grand Avenue Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009081062
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 7
Document Title
SR-57/SR-60 Confluence at Grand Avenue Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/20/2013
Present Land Use
Highway use along existing transportation facility area and adjacent parkland, commercial, residential and industrial
Document Description
Final: 1 HC & CD
Caltrans and the City of Industry are proposing freeway improvements to SR 57/SR60 confluence at the Grand Avenue interchange in Los Angeles County. The project consists of the reconfiguration of the approximately 2.5-mile confluence of SR-57 and SR-60, which includes the addition of auxiliary lanes and associated on-ramp/off-ramp reconfiguration. The alternatives involve a combination cloverleaf/Diamond configuration interchange, and partial cloverleaf interchange configuration to improve safety and operational deficiencies at the Grand Avenue interchange.
Contact Information
Name
Agustin Barajas
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 7
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Diamond Bar, Industry, Industry, Los Angeles, City of, Los Angeles
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
SR-57/SR-60 Confluence at the Grand Avenue interchange
Zip
91789
Total Acres
14.1
State Highways
SR 57/60
Waterways
Diamond Bar Creek
Township
2S
Range
9W
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.