Bridge 23C0077 Replacement Project on Suisun Valley Road at Suisun Creek
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009072004
Lead Agency
Solano County
Document Title
Bridge 23C0077 Replacement Project on Suisun Valley Road at Suisun Creek
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/3/2011
Document Description
Solano County is proposing to replace the existing single-span, 26.8-meter (88-foot) long, 4.9-meter (16-foot) wide, one-lane bridge with a new two-lane structure that will meet current bridge design standards. The new bridge will be ~ 25.0 meters (82 feet) long and 13.1 meters (43 feet) wide, and will be located on the same alignment over Suisun Creek. A temporary one-lane Bailey-bridge type detour across Suisun Creek will be placed immediately to the east of the existing bridge to maintain traffic flows during construction. Approximately 0.25 acre of permanent road right-of0way and 0.63 acre of temporary right-of-way for the temporary detour will be required to construct the new bridge. Additionally, permanent landscaping and maintenance easements will be secured on both side of the new bridge. Construction is anticipated in the summer of 2011.
Contact Information
Name
Phillip Seilhan
Agency Name
Solano County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fairfield
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
Twin Sisters Rd
Zip
94585
Total Acres
APE 2.28
Parcel #
county road
State Highways
No
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Suisun Valley
Waterways
Suisun Creek
Township
5N
Range
2W
Section
7
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Solano County Department of Resource Management
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.