Meridian Specific Plan Amendment Project Approvals
20 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009071069
Lead Agency
March Joint Powers Authority
Document Title
Meridian Specific Plan Amendment Project Approvals
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/22/2010
Document Description
The Project involves a General Plan Amendment on a 257.7 acre portion of the March Business Center North Campus. The modifications include redesignating the General Plan from SP-1 to SP-5 and modifying the following underlying land designations: reducing Business Park uses from 120.5 acres to 23.0 acres, an increase in Commercial uses from 20.3 acres to 22.2 acres, an increase in Industrial from 43.2 acres to 158.5 acres, a reduction in Mixed Use uses from 37.0 acres to 16.8 acres, an increase in Office uses from 18.3 acres to 21.5 acres, a reduction in Public Facility uses from 12.1 acres to 4.6 acres, and an increase in Park/Recreation/Open Space uses from 0 acres to 11.1 acres.
Contact Information
Name
Dan Fairbanks
Agency Name
March Joint Powers Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Moreno Valley, Perris, Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Van Buren Blvd/I-215
Zip
92518
Total Acres
957.7
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
I-215
Railways
BNSF
Airports
March ARB/Inland Port
Schools
Tomas Rivera Elementary
Township
5S
Range
4W
Section
Numer
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
March Joint Powers Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.