Middle Green Valley Specific Plan EIR
13 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009062048
Lead Agency
Solano County
Document Title
Middle Green Valley Specific Plan EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/26/2014
Present Land Use
LU: Agriculture, Rural Residential
Z: A-40, RR2.5, RR5
GP: Specific Plan Area
Document Description
The Middle Green Valley Specific Plan Project is a proposed mixed-use development that includes up to 400 new residences, agricultural tourism, local neighborhood retail and community facility uses, and over 1,400 acres of protected agriculture and open space. An EIR was prepared for the project and certified by Solano County in July 2010. A lawsuit challenging the adequacy of the EIR, specifically the water supply analysis, was subsequently filed by the Upper Green Valley Homeowners. In March 2012, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner. In response to the ruling, the County has prepared a revised water supply analysis and Revised Recirculated EIR that contained only that technical
Contact Information
Name
Matt Walsh
Agency Name
Solano County Dept of Resource Management
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Fairfield
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
Green Valley Road
Total Acres
1905
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
I-80, SR 12
Schools
Nelda Mundy & Oakbrook
Waterways
Green Valley Creek, Hennessey Creek, Suisun Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Solano County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.