Phase II - RD 17 100-Year Levee Seepage Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009062021
Lead Agency
Reclamation District 17
Document Title
Phase II - RD 17 100-Year Levee Seepage Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/10/2009
Present Land Use
PLU: Agriculture, flood control structures, city park, vacant, undeveloped
Z: General agriculture, medium- and low-density residential, open space/public, open space
GP: Open space, neighborhood park, open space/resource conservation, medium- and low-density residential
Document Description
The project involves work at 9 levee reaches along the landside of the east bank levee of the San Joaquin River, from the southern boundary of the City of Stockton, and to the western boundary of the City of Manteca. At 8 of the 9 reaches, seepage berms would be constructed along the landslide levee toe. At one site, acquisition of an easement on land along the levee toe is needed to perform various maintenance and site cleanup activities. Construction of seepage berms will increase the RD 17 levee system's resistance to underseepage.
Contact Information
Name
Eric Koch
Agency Name
California Department of Water Resources
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Lathrop
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
Near Inland Passage Wy and Brookhurst Blvd
Zip
95330
Total Acres
~22
Parcel #
multiple
State Highways
SR 120
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Lathrop ES, Mossdale ES
Waterways
San Joaquin River
Township
1S
Range
6E
Section
Unsurv
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Water Resources
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.