Alvarado Trunk Sewer Upgrade Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009061013
Lead Agency
City of La Mesa
Document Title
Alvarado Trunk Sewer Upgrade Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/27/2013
Document Description
CDFW is intending to execute a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code (#1600-2011-0344-R5) to the project applicant, City of La Mesa. The applicant proposes to alter the bed, bank, and channel of the stream to replace and partially realign a segment of existing sewer trunk main located adjacent to the Alvarado Creek channel. Project activities include diverting water around the project site, benching and trenching on the northern slope of Alvarado Creek, installation of a new pipeline, abandoning of the existing pipeline under the open channel, abandoning, replacing, raising, and/or installing new manholes, digging temporary pits to accommodate trenchless installation of the replacement pipe under the SR-125 right-of-way, restoring the channel slope to a 2:1 slope, and revegetating the slope and channel edge.
Contact Information
Name
Kelly Fisher
Agency Name
California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW)
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
La Mesa
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
North of Alvarado Creek, west of Amaya Drive, south of Fletcher Pkwy, east of Bus Court
Zip
91942
Total Acres
.53
State Highways
I-8, SR 125
Railways
MTS
Airports
Gillespie Field
Schools
Parkway MS
Waterways
Alvarado Creek
Township
16S
Range
1W
Section
17/8
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.