Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2018-060-01
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009032060
Lead Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Document Title
Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2018-060-01
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/22/2019
Document Description
The project entails installation and removal of two temporary summer Bailey bridges on the South Fork Eel River. The crossing in Humboldt County is for accessing a portion of Richardson Grove State Park and the crossing in Mendocino County is for accessing a portion of Standish Hickey State Recreation Area. The Bailey Bridge is a U.S. military-style panel bridge that assembles by extending from one abutment to reach the other abutment. The flexible bridge design allows the river to be spanned without moving any materials into the summer low flow channel. Bridge lengths are adjustable and can vary according to river configuration from year to year to match the dynamic river bar. Bridge abutments and approach ramps would be constructed first. Depending on site location, and requirements of other permits, bridge abutments consist of gravel-filled concrete pipes or large boulders backfilled with river gravel. In order for the far side bridge abutments and approach ramps to be developed, the heavy equipment must ford the river to accomplish the work.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer Olson
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Highway 101
Zip
95542
Total Acres
0.97
Parcel #
033-261-04, 033-261-05, 053-370-21
State Highways
101
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
South Fork Eel River, Pacific Ocean
Township
23N
Range
17W
Section
3
Base
MBD&M
Other Information
Base: Garberville
T:5S
S:13
R:3E
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.