Kirkwood Meadows Power Line Reliability Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009022100
Lead Agency
Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District
Document Title
Kirkwood Meadows Power Line Reliability Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/17/2012
Present Land Use
Open Forest and Recreation; Kirkwood is zoned as Planned Devleopment
Document Description
Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District (KMPUD) is proposing to construct, maintain and operate a 28-mile power line that would connect Kirkwood to the regional electric grid near Salt Springs Reservoir. The line would be owned and operated by KMPUD and dedicated to serve only the Kirkwood Community in order to provide a more reliable and cleaner source of electricity. The project is located within Amador, Alpine and El Dorado Counties. Approximately 3.1 miles would be built along an existing overhead line between Salt Springs Reservoir and Bear River Reservoir. The remaining ~25 miles would be buried within existing roadways and disturbance corridors to Kirkwood. The power line would be located predominately across Eldorado national forest and 15% of the line would cross private land.
Contact Information
Name
Michael Sharp
Agency Name
Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Counties
Alpine, Amador, El Dorado
Cross Streets
Hwy 88 & Kirkwood Meadows Drive
Zip
95646
Total Acres
165
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
Hwy 88
Waterways
Kirkwood Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Kirkwood
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Kirkwood Meadows PUD
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.