Presidential Substation Project

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009021059
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
Document Title
Presidential Substation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/21/2014
Present Land Use
Ag, Open Space/Undeveloped, Reserve Residential, Open Space, and Vacant. Multiple General Plan & Zoning designations.
Document Description
The new subtransmission line would occur within ~3.5 miles of existing ROW; A new 66/16 kV distribution substation on an ~ four acre site; Removal of ~79 distribution poles and 5 subtransmission poles located within existing ROW, and replacement with ~83 subtransmission poles to accommodate a new 66 kV subtransmission line that would feed the proposed substation from two existing 66 kV subtransmission lines; Four new underground 16 kV distribution getaways; and facilities to connect the substation to SCE's existing telecommunications system.

Contact Information

Name
Lynne Mosley
Agency Name
California Public Utilities Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks
Counties
Ventura
Cross Streets
Olsen/Madera Road and subtransmission line routes;
Zip
multiple
Total Acres
4
Parcel #
Many (City and Planning Area)
State Highways
SR 23 and SR 118
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Bard Reservoir; Arroyo Santa Rosa

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CA Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print