Twisselman Aggregate Surface Mine (Project); California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit (ITP) No. 2081-2011-069-04, Minor Amendment No. 4

32 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009021009
Lead Agency
San Luis Obispo County
Document Title
Twisselman Aggregate Surface Mine (Project); California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit (ITP) No. 2081-2011-069-04, Minor Amendment No. 4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/6/2015
Present Land Use
Agriculture

Document Description
This proposed project involves a minor amendment to the ITP, as amended, referenced above the extend the deadline to permanently protect the Habitat Management (HM) Lands from Dec. 11, 2014 to June 11, 2015. No other changes were made to the ITP. There is no change to the Project description or other ITP conditions. The ITP as amended authorizes take of Bakersfield cactus (Opuntia basilaris var. treleasel), species designated as endangered under CESA. CDFW issued the original ITP, and approved Minor Amendments Nos. 1 through 4 as a responsible agency under the CEQA relying on an EIR prepared and certified for the project by lead agency, County of San Luis Obispo. The ITP, as amended, allow take of the CA Endangered Species Act designated State Threatened san Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and San Joaquin antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni) and the State Endangered Giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens).

Contact Information
Craig Bailey
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Central Region (4)
1234 East Shaw Ave
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : (559) 243-4014

Location

Coordinates
35°19'52.07"N 119°54'3.32"W
Cities
San Luis Obispo
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Hwy. 58 & Soda Lake Road
Total Acres
6.8 sq. miles
State Highways
Hwy 58

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710.

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search