Gilead Sciences, Inc. - New Laboratory Building (NLB-1)
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008122064
Lead Agency
City of Foster City
Document Title
Gilead Sciences, Inc. - New Laboratory Building (NLB-1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/3/2012
Present Land Use
Office and Research and Development/Commercial Mix-Planned Development/Research Office Park
Document Description
The proposed project would amend the previously approved Vintage Park General Development Plan approved for the Gilead Sciences Corporate South Campus Master Plan to change the use of the office building planned to replace the building located at 355 Lakeside Drive from office to laboratory and building planned between 353 and 357 Lakeside Drive; 2) a larger building footprint for NLB-2; 3) removal of building NLB-3 has been removed off the plan; 4) a change in the orientation of the office buildings planned along the edge of Vintage Lake; and 5) a change in the nomenclature of the building names to address the proposed amendments.
Contact Information
Name
Curtis Banks
Agency Name
City of Foster City
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Foster City
Counties
San Mateo
Cross Streets
E. Third Ave/Lakeside Dr./Marsh Dr./Velocity Way/Vintage Park Dr.
Zip
94404
Total Acres
72
Parcel #
094-901-290,300,310,340,370,380,390,400,410;094-904-290,300,310,320,330,340
State Highways
Hwy 92
Schools
Audubon Elementary,Brewer Island Elementary,Bowditch Middle,Fost
Waterways
San Francisco Bay
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Foster City
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.