Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008121132
Lead Agency
Inyo County
Document Title
Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/28/2009
Document Description
The RTP serves as the planning blueprint to guide transportation investments in the County involving local, state, and federal funding over the next twenty years. Transportation improvements are categorized as short-term (0-10 yrs.) or long term (11-20 yrs.). The overall focus of the RTP is directed at developing a coordinated and balanced multi-modal regional transportation system that is financially constrained to the revenues anticipated over the life of the plan (2030). The coordination focus brings the County, City of Bishop, governmental agencies, Indian Tribal Governments, and citizens into the planning process. The balance is achieved by considering investment and improvements for moving people and goods across all modes including roads, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, goods, railroad, and aviation.
Contact Information
Name
Courtney Smith
Agency Name
Inyo County Local Transportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bishop
Counties
Inyo
Regions
Countywide
Cross Streets
Countywide
State Highways
395, 6, 168, 127, 178, 136, 190
Airports
Easter Sierra Regional
Waterways
LA Aqueduct
Other Information
Airports: Independence, Lone Pine, Shoshone
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Inyo County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.