Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Project Integrated Feasibility Report.
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008121014
Lead Agency
City of Los Angeles
Document Title
Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Project Integrated Feasibility Report.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/23/2018
Present Land Use
flood control, parkland, residential, industrial, and commercial, also a major transportation corridor
Document Description
LA River - Taylor Yard G2, ID #2017134. Allocation for a grant to the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority to assist with the acquisition of a Multipurpose Easement over 3++ acres of a 41+/- acre property, commonly known as the Taylor Yard G2 parcel, for habitat restoration, open space preservation, and to provide potential future wildlife oriented public use opportunities.
Contact Information
Name
Brian Gibson
Agency Name
CDFW Wildlife Conservation Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Zoo Dr. & Riverside Dr.; Fletcher Dr. & Riverside Dr.; E. Cesar E. Chavez Ave & Mission
Zip
90065
Total Acres
777
State Highways
I-5, 110, SR 2, 134
Railways
Metrolink, Metro, UPRR
Airports
Burbank Bob Hope
Schools
Sonia Sotomayor Learning
Waterways
Los Angeles River, Arroyo Seco, Verdugo Wash
Township
1S
Range
13W
Section
9
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Wildlife Conservation Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.