Lamb Canyon Landfill Solid Waste Facility Permit Revision - Environmental Assessment No. 39652

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008121005
Lead Agency
Riverside County
Document Title
Lamb Canyon Landfill Solid Waste Facility Permit Revision - Environmental Assessment No. 39652
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/18/2009
Document Description
The project was for an increase in Maximum or Peak Daily Tonnage from 3000 tons per day to 5000 tons per day, an increase in Maximum or Peak Daily Permitted Traffic from 759 vehicles per day to 913 vehicles per day, and increase in diversion activities within the Waste Recycle Park, including processing of tires, adding construction and demolition waste and green/woody waste processing, an expansion of the maintenance area and the potential installation of a landfill gas-to-energy facility in the future.

Contact Information

Name
Dianna Ohiosumua
Agency Name
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Beaumont, San Jacinto
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Gilman Springs Road
Zip
92223
Total Acres
1,184.5
Parcel #
421-170-034; 421-200-023, -024, -033, -043; 421-190-016, 421-220-014, -023, -024, -025, -026;
State Highways
79
Township
3S
Range
2W
Base
SBBM
Other Information
Parcel No Con.: 421-230-008, -009 Sections: 21, 28, 29

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print