I-5 North Stockton Corridor Improvements
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008102101
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
Document Title
I-5 North Stockton Corridor Improvements
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/28/2010
Document Description
NOTE: Notice of Availability
In the Central to North Stockton area widening is proposed to the I-5 freeway on the inside median increasing the freeway geometry from 6 to 8 lanes between Country Club Boulevard and the proposed North Gateway Boulevard interchange. Inside widening would accommodate mixed flow lanes (Alternative 1) or HOV lanes (Alternative 2). If alternative 2 is selected the existing inside lane wuld be converted to and HOV lane between Charter Way and County Club Boulevard. Improvements to four interchanges are also proposed including Hammer Lane (existing), Otto Drive (proposed), Eight Mile Road (existing), and North Gateway Bouldvard (proposed).
Contact Information
Name
Gail Miller
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 10
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
From 0.2 miles south of Charter Way/Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to 1.8 miles north of 8 Mile Rd
Zip
95677
State Highways
Interstate 5, SR 99, SR4
Schools
Bear Creek High School
Waterways
Smith Canal, Bear Creek, Calaveras River, and 14 mile, 5 mile & Mosher Slough
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.