Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP)- Russell Ranch Phase 2 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2012-0198-0007-R2)

SCH Number: 2008092051
Lead Agency: Folsom, City of (City of Folsom)
Document Title: Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP)- Russell Ranch Phase 2 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2012-0198-0007-R2)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 5/15/2019
Posted: 5/15/2019

Document Description: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2012-0198-0007-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, TNHC Russell Ranch LLC as represented by Mark Stacy. The Russell Ranch Phase 2 Project is located within the FPASP area and consists of constructing a 134.8-acre residential housing development. Authorized activities under the subnotification include: new culverts, channel re-establishment, and grading to fill aquatic habitat.

Contact Information: Dylan Wood
Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 358-2384

Cities: Sacramento
Counties: Sacramento
Other Location Info: The project is located south of Highway 50, north of White Rock Road, east of Prairie City Road, and west of the El Dorado County line, in Sacramento County, California.

Final Environmental Document Available at: The final environmental impact report prepared for the project is available to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. The Department's record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at the Department's regional office.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No