KER-58 Centennial Corridor (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0202-R4)
13 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008091102
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Document Title
KER-58 Centennial Corridor (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0202-R4)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/5/2016
Present Land Use
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agriculture
Document Description
CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0202-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Caltrans.
Project includes activities related to constructing the Centennial Corridor as a new east-west transportation corridor SR 58 to provide route continuity linking SR 58 (East) with I-5 going through the City of Bakersfield. This will require a bridge widening, a new bridge and pipeline relocation, and work on three existing bridge.
Contact Information
Name
Laura Peterson-Diaz
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Various: Cottonwood Rd / SR-58, Coffee/Brimhall Rds, and Stockdale Hwy / I-5
Zip
Various
Total Acres
127
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR 99, 58, 204, 178, 43 & I-5
Railways
BNSF, UPRR
Airports
Bakersfield and Joe Gottieb
Schools
9 Elementary, 2 High School, 4 Jr. High Schools
Waterways
Kern River, Friant-Kern, Stine, Carrier & Cross Vly canals
Township
30S
Range
27E
Section
2
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.