Centennial Corridor
13 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008091102
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Document Title
Centennial Corridor
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/10/2015
Present Land Use
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Agriculture
Document Description
The proposed project entails a new alignment for SR 58 to provide a continuous route along SR 58 from Cottonwood Road (post mile R55.6) on existing SR 58 East, east of SR 99 to I-5 (post mile T31.7). Improvements to State Route 99 from Wilson Road (post mile 21.2) to Gilmore Avenue (post mile 26.2) would also be required for the connection with SR 58. The action also includes: 1) route adoption/transfer for a continuous route from the existing freeway portion of SR 58 east of SR 99 to I-5 with the western portion on existing Stockdale Highway from Health Road to I-5; and 2) approval for construction of Segment 1, improvements within Segment 2, and intersection improvements at the Stockdale Highway and SR 43 intersection. Three build and one no build alternative were studied. Alternative B was chosen as the Selected Alternative.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer H. Taylor
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Various: Cottonwood Rd / SR-58, Coffee/Brimhall Rds, and Stockdale Hwy / I-5
Zip
Various
Total Acres
127
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR 99, 58, 204, 178, 43 & I-5
Railways
BNSF, UPRR
Airports
Bakersfield and Joe Gottieb
Schools
9 Elementary, 2 High School, 4 Jr. High Schools
Waterways
Kern River, Friant-Kern, Stine, Carrier & Cross Vly canals
Township
30S
Range
27E
Section
2
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.