William F. James Boys Ranch Temporary Modular Installation
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008082056
Lead Agency
Santa Clara County
Document Title
William F. James Boys Ranch Temporary Modular Installation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/26/2008
Present Land Use
GP Land Use: Open Space, Hillside Overlay
Zoning: Open Space
Document Description
The William F. James Boys Ranch is an existing minimum security juvenile detention facility original built to hold up to 96 boys between 15½ to 18 years of age. The facility currently houses only 60 juveniles due to previous change in the overall treatment program which required more dorm floor space per individual. The proposed project is to install temporary residential and shower modular buildings, relocate a classroom trailer from the adjacent Harold Holden Ranch, install new paved walkways, and install a fire access road to increase capacity from 60 to 84 juveniles at the facility in Morgan Hill, California.
Contact Information
Name
Alex Gallego
Agency Name
Santa Clara County Facilities and Fleet Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Morgan Hill
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Malaguerra Avenue
Zip
95037
Parcel #
728-35-001
State Highways
U.S. Highway 101
Schools
Blue Ridge High School, Live Oak High School, Windemere Academy
Waterways
Coyote Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Santa Clara County Facilities and Fleet Department
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.