Interstate 215 and Van Buren Boulevard Interchange Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008081120
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
Interstate 215 and Van Buren Boulevard Interchange Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/11/2011
Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA # 1600-2010-0121-R6 [Revision 1]) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant: County of Riverside, represented by John Marcinek, 3525 14th Street, City of Riverside, State of California, 92501, Phone (951) 955-3727. The Route 215 and Van Buren Boulevard Realignment Project is limited to the construction of two new bridges to replace the Van Buren Boulevard overcrossing at the Interstate 215 and the overhead spanning the railroad right-of-way west of the Van Buren Boulevard and Van Buren Boulevard/I-215 interchange, including: a new eastbound to northbound entrance ramp, an extension to Van Buren Boulevard east of the interchange, and realignment of all entrances and exits of the north and southbound Interstate 215 Van Buren Boulevard.
Contact Information
Name
Susan Bransen
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Moreno Valley, Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
I-215 and Van Buren Boulevard
Total Acres
127
State Highways
SR-60
Railways
BNSF
Airports
March Air Reserve Base
Schools
Arnold Heights Elementary
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.