Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/EA (DARP/EA) for the 11/5/1997 Kure/Humboldt Bay Oil Spill into Humboldt Bay at the Louisiana Pacific Export Dock
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008072117
Lead Agency
Fish and Game (OSPR), Department of
Document Title
Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/EA (DARP/EA) for the 11/5/1997 Kure/Humboldt Bay Oil Spill into Humboldt Bay at the Louisiana Pacific Export Dock
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/26/2008
Present Land Use
Projects consistent with present land use/zoning.
Document Description
Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the Natural Resource Trustees prepared the DARP/EA to assess injuries and evaluate restoration alternatives for natural resources injured by the Kure Oil Spill. The DARP/EA describes multiple restoration activities to benefit natural resources and compensate for loss of recreational services including bird projects (including federally endangered species), shoreline habitat projects, wetland habitat projects, and recreational use projects. The Natural Resource Trustee selected six preferred restoration alternatives for funding.
Contact Information
Name
Matt Zafonte / Katherine Verrue-Slater
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Location
Cities
Clearlake
Counties
Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake
Waterways
California Coastal Waters
Other Location Info
Multiple cities/communities within Humboldt and Del Norte Counties.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.