NLIP Phase 3 Waterside Outfalls Project

13 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008072060
Lead Agency
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Document Title
NLIP Phase 3 Waterside Outfalls Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2010-0017-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. Phase 3 of the Natomas Levee Improvements program, this element of the project is to install surface drains to property direct runoff from the adjacent levee and Garden Highway. The drains will be vegetated swales. As part of the Landside Improvements Project, Phase 2, SAFCA constructed 13 surface drain outfalls to the Sacramento River from the confluence of the Sacramento River and Natomas Cross Canal to approximately 2,500 linear feet south of the north Drainage Canal along the Garden Highway. There are four additional outfalls that need to be installed. The drainage swales will be located within private properties along the water side of the Garden Highway.

Contact Information
Sandra Jacks
Department of Fish and Game, North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

916-359-2916

Location

Coordinates
38°41'-"N 121°36'-"W
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sutter Sacramento
Cross Streets
Various
State Highways
5, 99, 80
Airports
Sacramento International
Waterways
Sac & American R., Natomas Cross Can., Natomas East Main Drainage Can., Pleasant Grove Cr. Can.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1007 7th Street, 7th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search