Danco; Case Nos: FMS-06-11 - Beau Pre Height Proposed Final Map Subdivision
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008072050
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Danco; Case Nos: FMS-06-11 - Beau Pre Height Proposed Final Map Subdivision
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/11/2011
Present Land Use
Undeveloped/AG-B7(.5)-AP-N-WR/AS
Document Description
The Alternative Tentative Map was approved and is a Final Map Subdivision of an approximately 197.3 acre parcel (formerly known as Norton Creek Estates, now termed Beau Pre Heights Subdivision) into 79 residential parcels ranging in size from 1.03 acres - 4.79 acres, and an open space parcel encompassing streamside management areas and wetlands. The Alternative Tentative Map will also protect an approximate 36-acre Sitka spruce forest stand deemed a "rare natural community" by the Department of Fish and Game.
Contact Information
Name
Michael Wheeler
Agency Name
Humboldt County Community Development Services Dept.
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Murray Road, Central Avenue
Zip
95521
Total Acres
197
Parcel #
510-011-15, -17 & 511-111-59
State Highways
US 101
Railways
No
Airports
Arcata-Eureka
Schools
Dows Prairie
Waterways
Pacific Ocean
Township
7N
Range
1E
Section
28,29
Base
HB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: McKinleyville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Humboldt County Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.