Cape Horn Tunnel Rehabilitation Project, Agreement No. 2008-0142-R4

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008072038
Lead Agency
Oakdale Irrigation District
Document Title
Cape Horn Tunnel Rehabilitation Project, Agreement No. 2008-0142-R4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/17/2008
Present Land Use
General Plan Designation - Agriculture, Zoning A-2-40

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Sec. 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, the Oakdale Irrigation Dist., represented by Steve Knell, for its Cape Horn Tunnel Rehabilitation Project. The applicant proposes to construct a berm across an unnamed tributary to Rodden Reservoir to prevent any sediment that may be mobilized by the Cape Horn Tunnel Rehabilitation Project from entering Rodden Reservoir. The berm will be removed and re-installed on a yearly basis until the Cape Horn Tunnel Rehabilitation Project is completed. Construct three temporary settling (retention) basins 10-ft. by 16-ft. deep in series. Seepage or stormwater on the downstream side of the Cape Horn Tunnel will be diverted to these settling basins to allow sediment to settle prior to discharge.

Contact Information
Annette Tenneboe
California Department of Fish and Game
Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : 559-243-4014 X231

Location

Cities
Oakdale
Counties
Stanislaus
Cross Streets
Horseshoe Road
Zip
95361
Total Acres
5.3
Parcel #
002-023-013, 015
Waterways
Rodden Lake, Lesnini Creek
Township
1S
Range
11E
Section
13,15
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 E. F St. Oakdale, CA 95361

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search