State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project

13 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008071075
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/16/2012
Present Land Use
The project is a proposed widening of SR-91 with connectors to Interstate 15 (I-15). Multiple land use designations occur in the study area.
Document Description
The SR-91 CIP proposes capacity, operational, and safety improvements on SR-91 and I-15. The project would widen existing SR-91 from the SR-91/SR-241 interchange in the cities of Anaheim and Yorba Linda in Orange County to Pierce Street in the City of Riverside in Riverside County. The project also includes improvements to I-15 in Riverside County between the I-15/Cajalco Road interchange in the City of Corona and I-15/Hidden Valley Parkway interchange in the city of Corona.

Contact Information

Name
Aaron Burton
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Anaheim, Corona, Riverside, Yorba Linda
Counties
Orange, Riverside
Cross Streets
SR-91 (SR-241 to Pierce St.) & I-15 (Hidden Valley Pkwy to Cajalco Rd.)
Zip
Multiple
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
SR-241, SR-71, I-15
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Santa Ana River
Township
Multip
Range
Multip
Section
Multip
Base
Multiple

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print