Goodman Logistics Center
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008071012
Lead Agency
City of El Monte
Document Title
Goodman Logistics Center
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/23/2018
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
Redevelopment of a +/- 55.7 acre property that contains +/- 1,036,371 s.f. of unoccupied warehouse buildings that were constructed in approx. 1956. The existing buildings would be removed and replaced with two modern logistics warehouse buildings and associated site improvements including but not limited to driveways, parking lots, truck courts, landscaping, lighting, and signage. The southern warehouse buildings would be 663,100 s.f. in size and the northern building would b e572,240 s.f. in size, for a combined total of 1,235,340 s.f. of building space. Discretionary approvals include Design Review No. 01-18 (DR 01-18), Conditional Use Permit No. 03-18 (CUP 03-18), Modification No. 02-18), and Development Agreement No. 01-18 (DA 01-18).
Contact Information
Name
Betty Donavanik
Agency Name
City of El Monte
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
El Monte
Counties
Los Angeles
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Citywide
Zip
91731
State Highways
I-10, I-605
Airports
El Monte Airport
Waterways
Rio Hondo River, San Gabriel River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of El Monte
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.