Sutter Bypass East Borrow Canal Water Control Structures Project: Weir No. 2 and Willow Slough Weir

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008062058
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources (DWR)
Document Title
Sutter Bypass East Borrow Canal Water Control Structures Project: Weir No. 2 and Willow Slough Weir
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/29/2008
Present Land Use
Parcels owned by the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Zoning: Agriculture, Open Space.
Document Description
Willow Slough Weir (CVFPB Encroachment Permit #18399) Reconstruct the earthern weir and replace its culverts to improve flow from EBC into Willow Slough. Replace fish ladder to improve passage for migrating salmon and steelhead. Weir No. 2 (CVFPB #18400); Replace the existing manually operated flashboard structure with a remotely operated gate structure that is safer and more effective to operate. Replace fish ladder to improve passage for migrating salmon and steelhead.

Contact Information

Name
Eric Butler
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Yuba City
Counties
Sutter
Cross Streets
Willow Slough Weir: Sacramento Avenue/ Kirkville Road; Weir No. 2: West end McClatchy Road
Zip
95993
Total Acres
7.85
Parcel #
29-210-008, 29-210-017, 13-340-046
State Highways
99
Waterways
Sutter Bypass, East Borrow Canal, Willow Slough

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print