South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP)
7 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2008062030
- Lead Agency
- Sacramento County
- Document Title
- South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 1/18/2019
- Present Land Use
- Various
- Document Description
- The project is a regional approach to conserving species and providing a streamlined environmental permitting process for new urban development and associated infrastructure projects within southern Sacramento County pursuant to the SSHCP and associated Aquatic Resources Program (ARP). The SSHCP was developed by the Plan Partners; County of Sacramento; City of Galt; City of Rancho Cordova; Sacramento County Water Agency; and the Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority. The ARP is a regional conservation approach for aquatic resources located within the SSHCP Plan Area. The SSHCP covers 28 native species - 11 of which are federally or state listed as threatened or endangered. THE SSHCP establishes a 36, 281-acre interconnected preserve system.
- Contact Information
-
Tim Hawkins
Sacramento County
827 Seventh Street, Room 225
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone : (916) 874-6141
Location
- Cities
- Elk Grove Galt Rancho Cordova Sacramento
- Counties
- Sacramento
- Cross Streets
- Walnut Grove - Thorton Rd; White Rock Rd to the north
- Total Acres
- 341,000
- Parcel #
- Numerous
- State Highways
- Hwy 50
- Railways
- Union Pacific
- Airports
- Franklin Field
- Schools
- Various
- Waterways
- Sacramento River levee
- Section
- Region
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Sacramento County
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 827 Seventh Street, Room 225, Sacramento, CA 95814
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes