State Route 65/Galleria Boulevard Interchange Modification Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008052104
Lead Agency
City of Roseville
Document Title
State Route 65/Galleria Boulevard Interchange Modification Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/9/2008
Present Land Use
State ROW surrounded by Commercial zoned properties.
Document Description
The purpose of the proposed project is to address transportation system capacity and safety concerns associated with the southbound SR 65 off-ramp to southbound Galleria Boulevard by:
- Widening the existing southbound SR 65 off-ramp to southbound Galleria Boulevard from one lane to two lanes;
- Modifying the existing traffic signal at the southbound SR 65 off-ramp/Galleria Boulevard intersection adding a new ramp signal;
- Modifying the existing lane striping on southbound Galleria Boulevard at SR 65 south of the interchanged to provide three travel lanes, instead of the current two lanes; and
- Widening and adding signals to the existing crosswalk at the southbound SR 65 off-ramp.
Contact Information
Name
Mark Morse
Agency Name
City of Roseville
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Roseville
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Galleria Boulevard and State Route 65
Zip
95678
Total Acres
2.7
Parcel #
363-010-030-000
State Highways
65
Waterways
Pleasant Grove Creek
Township
11N
Range
6E
Section
26
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Roseville City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.