Colorado River Bridge Replacement
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008051081
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
Colorado River Bridge Replacement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/15/2008
Present Land Use
Transitional with office, industrial, public/semi-public, residential and mobile homes land uses.
Document Description
NOTE: Joint Document comprised of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Environmental Assessment.
The California Department of Transportation (Department), in conjunction with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes a bridge replacement project located on State Route 62 in San Bernardino County, California and in Arizona on State Route 95 Spur in La Paz County. The proposal consists of constructing a non-increasing capacity project to replace or widen/rehabilitate the existing Colorado River Bridge (#54-1000) on the existing or slightly modified alignment.
Contact Information
Name
Boniface Udotor
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
State Route 62 and State Route 95 Spur
Zip
85344
Total Acres
12
State Highways
SR-62 and SR-91
Railways
Santa Fe Railway
Airports
Avi Suquilla Airport
Schools
Parker Unified District
Waterways
Colorado River
Township
1N
Range
25E
Section
24
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Big River, CA and Parker, AZ
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans District 8
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.