Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the PG&E Topock Compressor Station Final Groundwater Remediation Project
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008051003
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC)
Document Title
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the PG&E Topock Compressor Station Final Groundwater Remediation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/24/2018
Present Land Use
Open Space/Resource Conservation/Institutional
Document Description
Groundwater beneath and near the Topock Compressor Station (TCS) has been contaminated by chemicals associated with historical wastewater discharge from station operations related to compression of natural gas in areas known as Bat Cave Wash and East Ravine. The Groundwater Remediation Project, as analyzed and approved in the 2011 Groundwater FEIR and the 2013 Addendum to the EIR, involves manipulation of subsurface water flow to move a contaminated groundwater plume with Cr(VI) and other chemicals of potential concern, originating from past operations at the TCS, through a treatment zone.
Contact Information
Name
Mr. Aaron Yue
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Needles
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
National Trails Highway
Zip
92363
Total Acres
128.5
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR 66, I-40
Railways
BNSF Railroad
Waterways
Colorado River
Township
7N
Range
24E
Section
5,6,7,
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
Topock, Arizona
Other Information
Section: 9
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.